MailAdept by mailwarm vs Openbase: Trust Facts Side by Side
At a glance: verified facts
| Fact | MailAdept by mailwarm | Openbase |
|---|---|---|
| Domain registered | 2025-06-24 | 2025-06-30 |
| Policy changes we track | None detected | None detected |
| Last data check | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-01 |
From public records (company registry, RDAP, App Store metadata) and our policy snapshots — a "—" means we have no verified data for that field yet.
What we checked
Both are ai agents & automation tools we track. We have sourced facts for MailAdept by mailwarm on 3 of 5 areas and for Openbase on 3 of 5. The tables on this page set them side by side; we don't pick a winner. An area without sourced facts is not yet checked, and is left blank rather than guessed.
What their privacy policies say about AI training
Openbase (policy captured 2026-10-13):
Openbase does not use Workspace Content, source code, voice inputs, prompts, or
agent responses to train AI models.
Quoted verbatim from each vendor's own privacy policy — full context and more excerpts on each tool's report page.
Frequently asked questions
Is MailAdept by mailwarm legit?
MailAdept by mailwarm has a profile on this site. We have sourced facts on 3 of 5 areas so far, each linked to its source on the full report. Anything not yet checked is marked as pending.
Is Openbase legit?
Openbase has a profile on this site. We have sourced facts on 3 of 5 areas so far, each linked to its source on the full report. Anything not yet checked is marked as pending.
How this comparison works
Both tools are checked on the same five areas — company identity, data privacy, billing, product reality and reputation — using documented evidence only; an area with no evidence stays unchecked instead of guessed. Read the full reports: MailAdept by mailwarm trust report · Openbase trust report, or run any other tool through the trust check.