Glaze by Raycast vs Locofy: design-to-code agents: Which Is More Trustworthy?
At a glance: verified facts
| Fact | Glaze by Raycast | Locofy: design-to-code agents |
|---|---|---|
| Domain registered | 2019-08-20 | 2021-02-23 |
| Policy changes we track | None detected | None detected |
| Last data check | 2026-08-01 | 2026-08-01 |
From public records (company registry, RDAP, App Store metadata) and our policy snapshots — a "—" means we have no verified data for that field yet.
What the evidence shows
Both are developer & api tools tools we track. Comparing the 3 trust dimensions measured for both:
- On company & identity, the two are effectively tied (7.5/8 vs 7.5/8).
- On data & privacy, the two are effectively tied (2.5/5 vs 2.5/5).
- Glaze by Raycast leads on billing & subscription (13.6/16 vs 5.2/8).
Not yet measured for either tool: Product Reality, Community Reputation — this comparison covers only what we verified.
Quick verdicts
Glaze by Raycast: Glaze by Raycast earns a grade A (81.4/100) on our evidence-based trust rubric, measured on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. It scores strongly on company & identity but only moderately on data & privacy (2.5/5). We have not yet assessed product reality, so the grade is provisional.
Locofy: design-to-code agents: Locofy: design-to-code agents earns a grade B (72.4/100) on our evidence-based trust rubric, measured on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. It scores strongly on company & identity but only moderately on data & privacy (2.5/5). We have not yet assessed product reality, so the grade is provisional.
Trust score breakdown
| Dimension | Glaze by Raycast | Locofy: design-to-code agents |
|---|---|---|
| Company & Identity | 7.5/8 | 7.5/8 |
| Data & Privacy | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Billing & Subscription | 13.6/16 | 5.2/8 |
| Product Reality | — | — |
| Community Reputation | — | — |
| Total | 81.4/100 | 72.4/100 |
What their privacy policies say about AI training
Glaze by Raycast (policy captured 2026-07-03):
Analytics and Product Improvement
We collect analytics data to understand how the Service and applications built with it are used, to operate, secure, debug and improve the Service, and to inform product decisions.
Locofy: design-to-code agents (policy captured 2026-06-18):
Customer service information (including training and quality assurance).
Quoted verbatim from each vendor's own privacy policy — full context and more excerpts on each tool's report page.
Frequently asked questions
Is Glaze by Raycast more trustworthy than Locofy: design-to-code agents?
Glaze by Raycast currently scores higher — 81/100 vs 72/100 — across the 3 trust dimensions measured for both. That covers documented evidence only, not features or pricing.
Is Glaze by Raycast legit?
Glaze by Raycast currently holds trust grade A (81/100) based on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. The grade reflects only what we have measured; anything not yet assessed is marked as pending on the full report.
Is Locofy: design-to-code agents legit?
Locofy: design-to-code agents currently holds trust grade B (72/100) based on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. The grade reflects only what we have measured; anything not yet assessed is marked as pending on the full report.
More Developer & API Tools comparisons
How this comparison works
Both tools are scored with the same five-dimension, 100-point rubric — company identity, data privacy, billing, product reality and reputation — using documented evidence only; a dimension with no evidence stays unscored instead of guessed. Read the full reports: Glaze by Raycast trust report · Locofy: design-to-code agents trust report, or run any other tool through the trust check.