Cursor for iOS vs Stigg 2.0: Which Is More Trustworthy?
At a glance: verified facts
| Fact | Cursor for iOS | Stigg 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Domain registered | 1995-12-20 | — |
| Official iOS app | ✓ Cursor | — |
| Policy changes we track | None detected | None detected |
| Last data check | 2026-08-01 | 2026-08-01 |
From public records (company registry, RDAP, App Store metadata) and our policy snapshots — a "—" means we have no verified data for that field yet.
What the evidence shows
Both are developer & api tools tools we track. Comparing the 3 trust dimensions measured for both:
- On company & identity, the two are effectively tied (8/8 vs 4/4).
- On data & privacy, the two are effectively tied (5.5/10 vs 5.5/10).
- On billing & subscription, the two are effectively tied (12/12 vs 12/12).
Not yet measured for either tool: Product Reality — this comparison covers only what we verified.
Quick verdicts
Cursor for iOS: Cursor for iOS earns a grade B (78.7/100) on our evidence-based trust rubric, measured on 4 of 5 trust dimensions. It scores strongly on company & identity but only moderately on community reputation (4.01/7.5). We have not yet assessed product reality, so the grade is provisional.
Stigg 2.0: Stigg 2.0 earns a grade A (82.7/100) on our evidence-based trust rubric, measured on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. It scores strongly on company & identity but only moderately on data & privacy (5.5/10). We have not yet assessed product reality, so the grade is provisional.
Trust score breakdown
| Dimension | Cursor for iOS | Stigg 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Company & Identity | 8/8 | 4/4 |
| Data & Privacy | 5.5/10 | 5.5/10 |
| Billing & Subscription | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| Product Reality | — | — |
| Community Reputation | 4.01/7.5 | — |
| Total | 78.7/100 | 82.7/100 |
What their privacy policies say about AI training
Cursor for iOS (policy captured 2026-06-30):
Cursor · Privacy Policy
Product →
Enterprise
Pricing
Resources →
Sign inContactContact salesDownload
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Note: For information about how we collect and use training information to develop our models that power the Service, and your choices with respect to that information, please see our Privacy Overview.
Stigg 2.0 (policy captured 2026-07-01):
In certain cases, we may or will anonymize or de-identify your Information and further use it for internal and external purposes, including, without limitation, to improve the services and for research purposes.
Quoted verbatim from each vendor's own privacy policy — full context and more excerpts on each tool's report page.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor for iOS more trustworthy than Stigg 2.0?
Stigg 2.0 currently scores higher — 83/100 vs 79/100 — across the 3 trust dimensions measured for both. That covers documented evidence only, not features or pricing.
Is Cursor for iOS legit?
Cursor for iOS currently holds trust grade B (79/100) based on 4 of 5 trust dimensions. The grade reflects only what we have measured; anything not yet assessed is marked as pending on the full report.
Is Stigg 2.0 legit?
Stigg 2.0 currently holds trust grade A (83/100) based on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. The grade reflects only what we have measured; anything not yet assessed is marked as pending on the full report.
More Developer & API Tools comparisons
How this comparison works
Both tools are scored with the same five-dimension, 100-point rubric — company identity, data privacy, billing, product reality and reputation — using documented evidence only; a dimension with no evidence stays unscored instead of guessed. Read the full reports: Cursor for iOS trust report · Stigg 2.0 trust report, or run any other tool through the trust check.