Cotypist vs Typeahead 2.0: Which Is More Trustworthy?
At a glance: verified facts
| Fact | Cotypist | Typeahead 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Domain registered | 2024-07-03 | 2026-02-09 |
| Policy changes we track | None detected | None detected |
| Last data check | 2026-08-01 | 2026-08-01 |
From public records (company registry, RDAP, App Store metadata) and our policy snapshots — a "—" means we have no verified data for that field yet.
What the evidence shows
Both are productivity & assistants tools we track. Comparing the 3 trust dimensions measured for both:
- Cotypist leads on company & identity (6/8 vs 4.5/8).
- On data & privacy, the two are effectively tied (2.5/5 vs 2.5/5).
- On billing & subscription, the two are effectively tied (12/12 vs 12/12).
Not yet measured for either tool: Product Reality, Community Reputation — this comparison covers only what we verified.
Quick verdicts
Cotypist: Cotypist earns a grade A (82/100) on our evidence-based trust rubric, measured on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. It scores strongly on billing & subscription but only moderately on data & privacy (2.5/5). We have not yet assessed product reality, so the grade is provisional.
Typeahead 2.0: Typeahead 2.0 earns a grade B (76/100) on our evidence-based trust rubric, measured on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. It scores strongly on billing & subscription but only moderately on data & privacy (2.5/5). We have not yet assessed product reality, so the grade is provisional.
Trust score breakdown
| Dimension | Cotypist | Typeahead 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Company & Identity | 6/8 | 4.5/8 |
| Data & Privacy | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Billing & Subscription | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| Product Reality | — | — |
| Community Reputation | — | — |
| Total | 82/100 | 76/100 |
What their privacy policies say about AI training
Typeahead 2.0 (policy captured 2026-07-06):
TypeaheadGrammarlyChatGPTCopilotProcesses locallyWorks offlineAccount requiredOutbound connectionsData used for trainingOne-time price
Typeahead
Processes locally
Works offline
Account required
Outbound connections
Data used for training
One-time price
Typeahead is architecturally private.
Quoted verbatim from each vendor's own privacy policy — full context and more excerpts on each tool's report page.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cotypist more trustworthy than Typeahead 2.0?
Cotypist currently scores higher — 82/100 vs 76/100 — across the 3 trust dimensions measured for both. That covers documented evidence only, not features or pricing.
Is Cotypist legit?
Cotypist currently holds trust grade A (82/100) based on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. The grade reflects only what we have measured; anything not yet assessed is marked as pending on the full report.
Is Typeahead 2.0 legit?
Typeahead 2.0 currently holds trust grade B (76/100) based on 3 of 5 trust dimensions. The grade reflects only what we have measured; anything not yet assessed is marked as pending on the full report.
More Productivity & Assistants comparisons
How this comparison works
Both tools are scored with the same five-dimension, 100-point rubric — company identity, data privacy, billing, product reality and reputation — using documented evidence only; a dimension with no evidence stays unscored instead of guessed. Read the full reports: Cotypist trust report · Typeahead 2.0 trust report, or run any other tool through the trust check.